Across well construction operations, the same issues continue to impact efficiency, performance and cost.
A comparison of conventional centralizer limitations and the performance objectives behind CenterSet.
A conventional centralizer design, shown for comparison.
Running performance and centralization performance, fully separated: low-drag while running, then centralized with a higher restoring force and controllable standoff.
| Performance Factor | Traditional Designs | CenterSet Objective |
|---|---|---|
| Running Drag | Increased | Reduced |
| Stand-off | Often Compromised | Maintained |
| Cement Placement | Variable | More Consistent |
| Deployment Efficiency | Trade-offs Required | Optimized |
Well construction often involves trade-offs. Improving one performance characteristic can sometimes introduce compromises elsewhere, affecting running performance, operational efficiency, and ultimately the quality of the completed well.
At CenterSet, we’re developing technology specifically designed around these industry realities.
Whether you’re interested in field trials, investment, or joining the team, CenterSet is being built in conversation with the industry it serves. We’d like to hear from you.